Underwriting memo drafts
The file summarized into your memo template, every figure linked to its source.
Tell us the models and the users. We return a configuration sheet and a quote.
Spec a system →Model serving, access control and monitoring on hardware you own.
See the platform →
Thirty minutes with an engineer: your workflow, your data, and whether custom AI fits.
Book a scoping call →
Banks, lenders, insurers and investment firms need AI that examiners and model-risk teams can follow. We build underwriting support, KYC review and research tools with evaluation evidence and audit logs from the first day, on hardware you control.
In financial services the question isn't whether a model is clever but whether you can explain, validate and monitor it. We deliver what model-risk teams ask for (intended use, evaluation results, known limitations and a monitoring plan) alongside the system itself.
Customer data stays on your hardware, which simplifies vendor-risk and data-residency reviews, and every request is logged for records retention.
| Typical data | Loan files, financial statements, KYC documents, research, call notes |
|---|---|
| Common systems | Loan origination, core banking, CRM, data warehouse |
| Hardware | cstmAI Rack or Cluster in your data center |
| Rules in play | GLBA safeguards, records retention, model risk management |
The file summarized into your memo template, every figure linked to its source.
Documents checked against requirements, with gaps flagged for an analyst.
Cited answers across research, filings and internal notes.
First notice of loss and supporting documents structured for adjusters.
Answers for staff from policies, product terms and procedures.
Breaks explained and grouped, with suggested resolutions for review.

Two weeks: pick the workflow, audit the data, size the hardware, write the evaluation set.
A fixed-scope build against that evaluation set, reviewed every week with your team.
Hardware tested on our bench, then installed and connected on your site.
Your team runs it with our runbooks, or we run it for you.
Yes. We deliver evaluation sets, results and documentation in a form your model-risk team can test independently.
No. Models run on your hardware, and nothing is sent to an outside model provider.
Internal, analyst-facing work where a person reviews every output: memo drafts, document review and research search.
Tell us the models you want to run, how many people will use them and where the hardware should live. An engineer replies with a first configuration and the questions that decide the quote.